I work with you or your executive team to develop a negotiation mandate outlining the purpose and expected outcomes of your negotiation. Then with the negotiators we develop a plan. The plan consists of the negotiation strategy, the criteria for success, a map of the relationship you want with the other party. At this stage you may also want to rehearse or simulate the negotiation.
In the Room
I manage your back office: debriefing, coaching, and mentoring your negotiators. I offer tactical suggestions and assist them to understand the dynamics of the negotiation. I also assist with analysis of offers, and guide revisions to the plan to ensure your negotiators are on track and have the best possible information available to them.
Once the final bargaining begins, it is important to ensure that what is already agreed is preserved, last minute concessions are avoided and both parties understand the full agreement. My role is to keep the negotiation on track and close quickly.
Debrief and Implementation
Once a deal is struck, I debrief your negotiators, capturing the experience and learning as a case study. I work with you to communicate the outcome to stakeholders and implement the agreement by, for example, briefing your financial team or writing instructions to staff or operators.
Pharos Leadership Executive Coaching
Executive coaching can develop skills, improve performance and develop leaders. As a Pharos Leadership executive coach, I can offer a range of coaching and development solutions to you and your team. Negotiations are an excellent coaching opportunity.
Additional Expertise Internal Consulting Group
I advise executives and teams leading change projects, restructuring, and mergers & acquisitions. As a accredited professional with Internal Consulting Group (IGC), I can offer my clients access to global management consulting expertise.
We want our clients to achieve their best possible outcome from negotiations.
We believe this is possible only if negotiators have a clear mandate, are well prepared, understand their best alternative outcome, and can judge success against objective criteria.
We also know that sustainable outcomes require relationships built on trust, so negotiators must have the emotional intelligence to navigate relationships both with counterparties and your stakeholders.
There are no tricks to control the other party so your best possible outcome may not be the one you ideally want. If you understand your alternative you can always know your best possible outcome.
As a consultant, I am a knowledge worker whose skill is managing information. And even a small business like Focus on Ideas needs to have some processes to collect, collate and store information from my research, my clients, my accountant and the tax office. I use Xero for my finances, but this is only part[…]
Courtesy of Blog.HubSpot.com
Useful For Force Field Analysis is a decision making tool to analyse the forces driving change and the forces opposing change. It can be used as a qualitative or quantitative tool. Limitations A Force Field Analysis is a simple one dimensional visualisation of a change or issue. Force Field Analysis was developed by sociologist Kurt[…]
Useful For A Gant Chart, also know as a PERT (Program Evaluation Review Technique) chart, shows the activities in a project Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) in a time sequence. It is developed from an Activity Network Diagram and is used in conjunction with resource management and budgeting tools. It shows the scheduled start, finish, duration[…]
Useful For An Activity Network Diagram, also know as a PERT (Program Evaluation Review Technique) diagram, is used to show the time sequence of events leading to an objective. It is used for project management and is the key input for Critical Path Analysis. It is often used in conjunction with resource management and budgeting[…]
Useful For A Decision Matrix is used to compare a number of options against defined criteria. Often both quantitative and qualitative criteria are mixed so a numeric scale is used to enable scores to be added. Each criteria may be given a weighting which adjusts its score. The weighted scores for each criteria are added to give a total score that ranks the[…]
Useful For This is a variation of Root Cause Analysis used to analyse a problem or issue by breaking it down into component parts. Limitations Requires the problem (effect) to be correctly identified first. The way the problem is specified can affect the output. Discussion of causes and relationships can quickly become complicated. The diagram is[…]
Useful For Interrelationship diagrams are a way of organising issues. It is sometimes used following the KJ Method. The diagram allows plotting of complex non-linear relationships and probing of cause and affect and interdependence between elements.. Limitations Primarily illustrative. Insights and discussion need to be captured separately. Diagrams can easily become very complex. The interrelationship[…]
Useful For Identifying themes and relationship amongst issues. KJ can be used to build common understanding of problems, reveal hidden information and reveal causes. It is particularly useful for complex, multi-faceted problems or problems involving multiple stakeholders. Limitations Important information can be “left behind” in the process. The exercise takes time to complete. Facilitators can[…]
I was recently party to a heated email exchange with a colleague. The colleague was unhappy with something I had done. Their objection seemed to me to be unreasonable. We don’t live in the same city, and we chose not talk by phone so what followed was an angry exchange of emails. What was said[…]